Oops... It was pointed out that I got the credits wrong in the header. I've regenerated the second patch to correct it.
Bill On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Bill Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Luke. Adding the ability to set PulseAudio parameters in > speechd.conf was harder than I thought it would be, but it's done. > Attached are two patches. The first is the patch file to get the > basic pulseaudio driver that you've tested. The second is the work I > had to do to get the PulseAudio buffering parameters exposed to the > user through speechd.conf. Just add these to your debian/patches > directory and the 00list file. > > I wasn't sure where to e-mail these... sorry for the spam! > > Bill > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Bill Cox <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, Luke. That's great! For some reason, I keep expecting the Magic >> Code Fairies to clean up code before it gets included anywhere. >> Earlier in this thread, Rui Batista said he was going to do some >> cleanup - making PulseAudio buffer parameters configurable again. So, >> naturally I didn't bother. If you can wait a few hours, I'll do that >> change, and post an improved patch here. >> >> Bill >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Luke Yelavich >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:25:47PM EST, Luke Yelavich wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:19:32PM EST, Bill Cox wrote: >>>> > Hi, Luke. The new pulse drivers work well for me on both Karmic and >>>> > Lucid, and I haven't heard of users with poor performance so far, but >>>> > it could be machine specific. The strange thing is you're reporting >>>> > libao works well, and all I did was cut and paste the pulseaudio calls >>>> > libao makes into the libao driver, so I would expect similar >>>> > performance, other than for the buffering settings I make in the >>>> > pulse-simple interface. >>>> >>>> *slaps head. I didn't apply the patch I created with the new pulse file. >>>> I'll test again and get back to you, >>> >>> Ok, now that I actually have it aplying and built, the difference is *VERY* >>> noticable. Currently using espeak with pulse, but will try with portaudio >>> again since bits of short text, especially if arrowing very fast, are a >>> little bit clicky. >>> >>> Long term, there is the power consumption issue that Lennart raised, since >>> we are using the simple API, but we need to work that out as best we can, >>> and go from there, but I think this will be going into Ubuntu very shortly, >>> once I have done a few more tests. >>> >>> Great work! >>> >>> Luke >>> >> >
patches.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
-- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
