On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:01:12PM EST, Hammer Attila wrote: > Hy, > > Luke, unfortunately one %s style desktop environment announce > message is wrong marked for translation in > src/orca/scripts/default.py filename. > I reported this issue, and attached two style fix patch with > following bugreport, if possible, please review the proper patch: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744875
Thanks, will get this fixed after beta, along with the new orca upstream release. > I have got a technical question with future: > If Ubuntu specific gnome-orca package debian/patches directory > already containing a patch with implementing a function, and need > fixing a problem with patched version for a function implementation > patch, what place need doing the fixes? For example, if I want > easyest attaching a fix, what format you prefer better: a fix with > you already doed complete patch, or direct fix patch with original > already patched source file (now src/orca/scripts/default.py > filename)? > Now, I both two way make the patch. > This situation need attaching both two style patches, or enough > modifying original devian/patches directory already existing > function implementation patch? Whatever suits you, I can work either way. The only thing I request is that you create your patches with diff -u, i.e when running the diff command, please use the -u argument to produce a unified diff, which is the same format to the orca patches. Unified diffs are much easier to read. Luke -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
