On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:34:43PM -0300, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:57 PM, James Tait <james.t...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On 05/06/13 16:36, Martin Albisetti wrote: > >> So, I realised that we may want to also have "SDK version", which > >> is really what the client can use to figure out what's installable > >> or not. > > > > Separate from click_framework? I probably don't really know enough > > about the specifics of the client, but I'd imagine they'd be aware of > > what frameworks they support. > > I think it's different. Think. Maybe Colin or Stuart can comment on it. > I would guess that the click package framework itself would have > different versioning than the SDK. I have been conflating them as the > same, but maybe they're not.
No, Click-Framework is there principally to encapsulate the SDK versioning. If it doesn't cover that then we have a problem. :-) You may be thinking of Click-Version, which is intended to describe the version of the Click package specification that the package was built for. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
