Hey, thanks a lot for your thoughts on this, Dave!
On 02.08.2013 18:27, Dave Morley wrote: > One thing I would like to see tested at least the first time round > would be handling of the apps during a phone update. The last thing > we want when upgrading the phone images is all the users installed > apps being removed or still being installed but not visible in the > apps lens. With regards phone updates rather than app updates. I think this is going to be rather hard, especially with new apps coming in, as they very likely don't have updates yet. :-) Aren't click apps installed into a versioned directory? > With regard to app updates I'm assuming that unless the dev is > changing text, images etc that then can just click edit on the click > package and upload the new package. There was only some discussion about apps changing security requirements during updates. Is there anything else we should consider an important case? > For the initial manual review process to have a detailed example of > what to look for/at would be good, or a video/hangout so we can see a > review in progress. Monkey see monkey do learning and all that. We will all have to learn what's important by doing the reviews ourselves. Maybe a collective review session over hangout would help? > One last thing would be a prior art check unless we are leaving that > to the abuse reporting mechanism? I'm assuming it will be easy enough > to check that an app that is published via click won't allow an app > with the same name to be submitted. How much of a concern is this? Have a great day, Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
