On 08/21/2013 06:38 AM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com > <mailto:ja...@canonical.com>> wrote: > > On 08/20/2013 12:43 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com > <mailto:ja...@canonical.com> > > <mailto:ja...@canonical.com <mailto:ja...@canonical.com>>> wrote: > > > > On 08/16/2013 07:26 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > with the appstore opening in alpha stage soon, it's important we > figure > > > out how the reviews are going to take place until we have the > process > > > more automated. This will be a good learning experience for us, > what we > > > can automate, what common problems are, how much time it all > takes and > > > where across all teams needs to be fixed to make things scale up > to > > > bazillions of apps. > > > > > ... > > > It should be interesting to rotate the duty, take notes on > > > > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppStore/Decisions/ReviewRequirements > > > > > > and collect tips, improve our review notes and script what we can > to > > > have the process automated in the near future. > > > > > > Even though automating the review process is the immediate goal, > I'm > > > sure this learning experience is going to help in the larger > project, so > > > SDK bits can be improved, and many other bits and pieces as well. > > > > I didn't put this in the wiki, but could. I noticed when doing my > first reviews > > a few things: > > * 'click build' creates a package which is 'Architecture: all' and > a > package > > name with *_all.click even if the package has compiled code (LP: > #1214380). > > Seems like this might be part of the fat package discussion, but > as it > > stands now, the appstore doesn't support compiled code-- eg, a > developer > > could upload something for i386 but it wouldn't work on armhf. > This > seems to > > be planned for August based on the wiki[1] > > > > > > You should be able to add "Architecure": "armhf" into the manifest. > > > > The click manifest supports "architecture"? This is not documented in the > upstream documentation: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~click-hackers/click/trunk/view/head:/doc/file-format.rst > > > > It is implemented though > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~click-hackers/click/trunk/view/head:/click/build.py#L96 > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~click-hackers/click/trunk/view/head:/click/build.py#L177 > > > Perhaps it's not the general way we want to expose arch dep packages hence the > reason it's not documented. But I am depending on it for all the apps we need > to > transition (i.e.; notes, dialer, messages, camera, mediaplayer, gallery, > filemanager, terminal, ...) > Interesting (I created LP: #1214864 for the documentation bug) and I can add a test for this to the reviews.
How does the appstore handle uploads with the same version but different architectures? Perhaps this question is premature still.... -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
