Yes, completely agree that we should do this for empty search results. I'll make sure it's on the requirements when I do designs for search results pages (I'm only just back from a week away so won't know when that'll be until after I've caught up with Yolanda).
Cheers, Mike On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Alejandro J. Cura < alejandro.c...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Martin Albisetti > <martin.albise...@canonical.com> wrote: > > I'd like to propose we add to empty search results the possibility for > > the server to return "related apps". > > > > We can change over time what the server uses to calculate what to > > return, we just need to agree what the changes to the API would be, > > and make sure the server and the client can represent this. > > > > On the server side, Fabian is ready and eager to work on this. > > > > Who can pick up the scope side of things, help define the API and make > > this change? > > o/ > We discussed something like this during the scopes sprint, and the > simplest way seems to be a new optional field, added to each result > item, that specifies if the result is part of the main set of results, > or is part of the "related apps". > It could be something like "related: true", or "category: related". > Would that be enough? > > Mike: do we want to specify some other text for that group of results? > I'd love to see some design for this. > > cheers, > -- > alecu >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
