On 06/11/2014 11:38 AM, David Barth wrote: > Le 11/06/2014 18:25, Martin Albisetti a écrit : >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >>> An idea I had was to make click-reviewers-tools entirely self-contained. >>> Ie, it >>> ships the policy files in its own click-reviewers-tools directory along >>> with all >>> the frameworks it wants to support. This does add a maintenance burden, but >>> I >>> don't think too much. We could automate slurping in the bits we embed in the >>> package. This has a lot of benefits: >>> * it works easily with the SDK (they don't need a separate chroot) >>> * we don't have to install different frameworks on the machine doing the >>> reviewing >>> * we don't have to install new apparmor policy and/or apparmor on the >>> machine >>> doing the reviewing >>> * SRUs or -backports are pretty simple >>> * the automated reviews machine can stay on an LTS >> Big +1 from me. > Same here. Right now you can't prepare / review a new package on a Trusty > install, and that's really odd. > Right, we all agree which is why Daniel started this conversation. :)
> Is there a branch to test that implements some of this? > Not yet-- since we are in agreement, I'll take an action to do it and document how to update the packaging and when (ie, I won't do the automated slurping now). I have a couple of high priority items to get to first, but will get to this hopefully next week. -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
