This is in fact how the IDE is working today, and we are trying to clean up the UI so its a bit more consistent and obvious.
FWIW I wrote this [1] last week to ensure people understand the overall model. Comments welcome, would like to get this on the d.u.c site. Pat [1] https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/14Br1GQExmPAwI4lCLG52WWounWu9wylTJElmWXUtJQc/edit On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Well, that should all be in the chroot; that is, if you're creating Click > packages against the latest frameworks from a LTS host, you need an > up-to-date Click, probably debootstrap, and then an up-to-date click chroot > of utopic. Click is fairly stable and low on dependencies though, so I dont > expect much more has to be backported. Backports / PPA are for the rare case > where we're updating packages in some touch-stable series (stable in the > sense of the system-image channel). > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> On 03.07.2014 13:43, Loïc Minier wrote: >>> >>> thanks a lot for attacking this; I realize it must be painful when >>> servers or developer systems are on a stable/LTS release and you try to >>> target the latest frameworks or review packages created against these. >> >> >> Especially if one of the backported packages will pull in updates >> dependencies, etc. >> >> >> >>> The original plan was to use click chroots to decouple this, and enable >>> some PPA so that the chroot would be $series + click frameworks PPA for >>> the series. >>> >>> The update to pull the list of allowed frameworks from the store is an >>> improvement over hardcoding it in click-reviewer-tools, so it's great to >>> have this now, but this approach generally prevents us from e.g. >>> checking whether binaries are tied to the right libraries / use the >>> right symbols or whether QML sources use the right modules for this or >>> that framework. The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good though :-) >> >> >> >> >> https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/click-reviewers-tools/check-libs/+merge/225166 >> is separate work done by Michael. The MP is currently on hold though. >> >> >> Have a great day, >> Daniel >> >> -- >> Get involved in Ubuntu development! http://packaging.ubuntu.com >> Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+ >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers >> Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers > Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers Post to : ubuntu-appstore-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-appstore-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
