On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:33 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
I don't condamn proprietary software users. But that's just as shame
when people see Ubuntu coming with "great professionnal art software"
such as Gimp and Inkscape, but artwork wasn't done with that tools. Does
the pope preach for islam ?
That pretty much sums it up for me. Doesn't matter if you make it in PS or AI in a particular format. Doesn't belong in linux, and it's a shame if it ends up here. I have AI, PS, and many others, but I won't buy them anymore and I do not use them to make anything that ends up on your linux desktop, heck I don't even use them anymore. I don't care if you use it, as long as the art stays on the other platform. You call it condemnation, but I call it common sense. If money was pumped into Human, it would have gone a lot farther if put into inkscape and the gimp while allowing tangerine to be the default ;) "Hey those icons look great!"..."but they were made with PS on a mac", is absolutely silly. Keep it in the family or take it somewhere else :D Wha?...ashamed of your great OS?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
