It's more important to use open formats than open software, I would have concerns if the files were saved in .ai or .cdr rather than svg and that the components of the design where some how withheld from other artists and developers preventing the maintenance of the art.
Why should I care what the program you used to make it was? use what you work best in and produce some great art. Best Regards, Martin Owens On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:22:42 +0200 , Michiel Sikma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I don't think that it "doesn't belong" in Linux. It's not a sin to use >proprietary software, nor is it a sin to work on Linux with different >operating systems. It's not like icons made on a Mac or Windows PC are >stolen wares or negatively connotated in any way. They're just icons. > >Myself, I'm simply a designer who's used to using Adobe's products, like >most others in this profession. I contribute to Ubuntu in my spare time, >and if I had to try and learn GIMP or Inkscape, I wouldn't have any time >left to contribute. And what are the real advantages of switching to >either of those programs? It won't make my art any better, but it will >make some people feel better, even though the users of the software >largely will not care or even know. > >I'm thankful, however, that a lot of people have responded to this by >saying that they're okay with the usage of proprietary software. I just >wanted to make sure that this list won't actively discourage users to >contribute if they do. It's actually this reason why I haven't started >contributing to Ubuntu since around the Hoary cycle. I just didn't feel >like I belonged in what seemed to be a small and strict community. > >Michiel > >-- >ubuntu-art mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > -- #::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::# #::.. http://www.doctormo.co.uk/ ..::# #::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::# -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
