Op 27-jun-2006, om 16:13 heeft Michiel Sikma het volgende geschreven:
Op 27-jun-2006, om 16:11 heeft Troy James Sobotka het volgende
geschreven:
On Tue, 2006-27-06 at 07:33 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
The desktop colour should not be too bright, or it becomes tiring to
look at all day. We generally have chosen to go with darker, richer
colours so that there is less strain on the eyes. Also, we are
preferring not to have distro branding that is so obvious (the big
Ubuntu logo) but instead to choose images which are distinctive
enough
that they are immediately recognisable in screenshots to anyone who
has worked with Ubuntu before.
I think this is very important. We need to establish a
clear idea as to how much branding is acceptable.
Perhaps during the proposal phase we can offer up a good
spectrum of similar ideas that feature branding through
to non branding in a good gradual progression.
We should probably collect this comment as well. Niel?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
It's also important to note that bright backgrounds just don't seem
to cut it in general due to the poor size and opacity of the shadow
underneath white text underneath desktop icons.
That nice rendition of the logo that Niklas made might be useful in
other contexts, however.
Michiel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
PS: Niklas, could you provide a source version or 32-bit transparent
PNG of that logo (http://www.weidel.se/gfx/desktop2%201400.png)? I'm
sure it'll be useful for others.
Michiel
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
