From the Trademark Usage Policy:
«Before using the any of these marks outside the scope of fair use (such as using these in a review to refer to the product), please send an email to [MAILTO] [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your name, contact details, and a short explanation of your proposed usage of the trademarks.»
I don't quite understand how this guideline can coexist with the rights that the license CC-by-sa grants, which clearly stands outside the scope of fair use. Isn't there a collision here? My question is: can I freely modify and redistribute the Ubuntu Logo as the ubuntu-artwork license says? On 7/1/06, Corey Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/30/06, Gabriel Rodríguez Alberich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > I have a legal question. The Ubuntu Logo is subject to trademark > policy (http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/TrademarkPolicy/). However, it's > included in the package "ubuntu-artwork", whose copyright says its > contents are licensed under Creative Commons. Is this an incoherence > or am I missing something? Gabriel, Copyright and Trademark are not the same thing. The actual art may be Creative commons but usage of it is covered under the trademark guidelines. Moz Corp does this with Firefox and Thunderbird. Hence why Ubuntu's browser is called Firefox, not Mozilla Firefox. Corey -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
