On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 21:26 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> On Sa, 2006-07-22 at 12:16 -0700, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
> > My only thoughts are that it would seem a colossal task
> > to try and get _three_ full looks included.  What
> > are you encompassing by a look when you suggest those
> > three?
> > 
> well, we already have three ;) 
> 
> there is "default" , "young" (which is the same as default with a more
> kid oriented wallpaper) and "plain" (which uses the same metacity and
> gtk theme, no wallpaper a all (plain color) and the tango brown iconset)


Sorry for my ignorance on the Dapper release Oli.

I would suggest then that perhaps considering the size
and scope of that, a summary of strengths and weaknesses
combined with a visual slate for reference would be the
best starting point.  From there, I would specifically
nail down some targets and spec them so that we can 
steer development. 

Even that takes a ridiculous amount of work, but alas,
baby steps.  ;)

Keep up the terrific work Oli, my daughter loved 
Breezy Edubuntu.

Sincerely,
TJS

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Reply via email to