Matthew Nuzum wrote: > Mikkel's suggestion that his splash concept was controversial made me > laugh a bit in remembrance of Ubuntu calendar. > > I noticed that the last calendar appears to have come out in the spring > of 2005 - quite some time ago considering the entire time line of Ubuntu. > > I know there are artists who are eager to help but simply don't feel > they fit in with the current specs. It pains me a bit to know people > want to help but are unable. > > I wonder if Ubuntu Calendar should be resurrected as a way to get more > people involved. > > Instead of packages like ubuntu-calendar-march, we could create > ubuntu-calendar-edgy and ubuntu-calendar-edgy-november (and etc). Then, > each edgy calendar would be designed to work harmoniously with the edgy > default themes. > > When Edgy+1 comes out, ubuntu-edgy-calendar would stop getting updates, > and ubuntu-calendar-f* would be released with each fitting harmoniously > with the edgy+1 desktop. > > No need to follow the trend of the original calendars; instead each new > calendar could vary quite a bit from the others with the common thread > being its cohesiveness to the rest of the theme. > Great idea, but at least you've solved one of the problems with the last edition of ubuntu-calendar: NO MORE PORNO! We don't want to be called "The Porn Distro" or "Ubuntu Linuxxx" again like with Warty...
Viper550 -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
