2006/11/23, Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:15 +0100, Gianluca Sartori wrote: > Style and Coherency
As you can
imagine, the icons take a good deal of effort. Currently, the bulk of the icons were contracted by sabdfl and built by the IconFactory. If someone were to construct a set of panel icons that met sabdfl's approval, it is possible they could be included. This is not an easy endeavor however. ;)
Do you think that the idea of a flat macos-like set of icons for the panel would be accepted by the sabdfl? I can invest time to do them, but only if it's not an already lost battle.. BTW, what's _your_ opinion about it?
Colors The palette has never been used to the best of my knowledge. There is currently _no_ official palette for Ubuntu.
I read your page on Ubun2. To me a palette is one of the first things to do when dealing with consistency beside to style guidelins. These are my top priorities when designing something. I think that we absolutely need a well defined palette.
Beryl I believe if you read the last UWN you will see some information on the newest Feisty related Compiz elements.
Okay
Window Manager I believe some of the limitations are inherent in GNOME. You would either need to address them with code or formalize a bug report for change
Okay Hope this helps,
TJS
Yep, it helped. I'm new to the community, so probably some points I talked about were obvious to you. Cheers, Gianluca --
ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
