> We really need to quit grasping and simply accept the fact > that the language barriers are symptomatic of the word > 'universal' being completely a foolish puff of smoke > to even _attempt_ to pursue. Aye. Agreed.
> From a practical integration element -- it also must _readily_ fit > into the the "Human" scheme. At the very least, it should be based > on the "Human" warning type symbols. (Yet another reason we need DESIGN > guidelines for Human.) Have you a link for me? I have found the artwork links on the wiki to be pretty confusing. Then again, I've been distracted. > It doesn't stop at this however, we could very well include the vast > spectrum of different users in this -- power users, motor impaired, > etc., all require different graphical renderings and layouts. In terms of these "bands" of users they are like a locale within a major Locale. > At the very least, we need to bind icons to locales and offer fallbacks > as per the standard icon scheming in GNOME. I fully agree that icons -- all artwork really -- should be locale-based. What would you say to the idea of a website that allows icons to be rated per locale, per app/purpose? Those with the highest votes over time should be used in preference to any one designer's "big idea". /d -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
