Hi Étienne On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 12:13 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > Is the general consensus here that intermixing Human and Tango icons is > > acceptable? > > This was discussed. The Tangerine project first aim to provide a > Humanized Tango theme. However, it does not fit the sabdfl taste. > Remember that the consensus IS sabdfl ;).
Isn't that more of a Tangofied Human theme, not the other way around? > Imo, Tangerine is very complete and fit very well both with Tango theme > and overall Human Gtk+, Metacity and Wallpaper theme. Human has nice > icons, but often, tiny icon (24x24 and beyond, see menu for example) are > really unusable. Tango take tiny icon in account, not Human. Human is > quite incomplete, but that's not that easy to build an entire icon set. > Human was created by "IconFactory" an opaque structure (individual ? > entreprise ?) hired by sabdfl. That is a shame. Like I said, I prefer the Human style and would love if some style guidelines and palettes were released so that I could, for example, "Humanize" the Gossip and Ephy icons. > I already told that here, but obviously, people do not want to adapt > icon to tiny size. > > What i like in Human is folder, warning, error, information, report a > bug. But that does not make an entire set. The ubuntu logo (menu bar, > about ubuntu) is fuzzy where all other icons are sharp. > > So, yeah, Ubuntu lake consistency. > > See http://daniel.holba.ch/ubuntu/ic/ . > > Étienne. > -- Alex Jones http://alex.weej.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
