Hey, but didn't UDS chose Tango guidelines? If this still can change, what does that means (UDS = Tango)?
Cheers, T. On Nov 7, 2007 4:37 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07/11/2007, Can K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What do you think of this icon set: http://art.gnome.org/themes/icon/759 > > > It contains only a few, but i really like the folder icon. > > > > > > (sorry if i have sent two mails, but i'm a bit confused by mailing > lists) > > > > That's even worse than the current icon set! I've a question to all of us: > Is Ubuntu bound to the Tango guidelines? > > No > > > From my point of view, they're quite unprogressive for a modern Desktop > OS. Tango icons always look too much comic-like and childish (in fact, this > is a good criterion for Tango to be the default look of Edubuntu). > > Can't we just release from the Tango dogmas and create something different > and new (but yet regocnizable as Ubuntu of course)? > > No. Not "just". It is a *huge* undertaking creating an icon set from > scratch (atleast if you want more or less full coverage). > > > I don't think this will be possible if we still stick to Tango! Or will > there be no discussion about this topic...? > > Are we not discussing it? "This is not an argument" ;-P > > Cheers, > Mikkel > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
