Yeah, the main concept is that not every button looks the same, there is some random variance thrown in by creating parts of the widget algorithmically. Its a great concept, but the mockups arn't that hot. Something like random noise in the background fo instance.
On Nov 18, 2007 4:20 PM, tonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That was a mockup from 2005 by seth nickell I'm sure the idea can be > improved on. > > tonic > > > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 12:42 +0200, Donn wrote: > > > tiger stripe example > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog-images/monkey-hoot/tiger-stripe-window.png<http://www.gnome.org/%7Eseth/blog-images/monkey-hoot/tiger-stripe-window.png> > > > > > > There were other examples but I think that is the best. > > > > I find that hard to look at. I keep "seeing" a larger pattern clipped > and > > under the entire form -- as if it's only showing through the buttons. > Like an > > effect gone wrong, or a crashing window of some kind. > > > > Perhaps if the stripes were varied, toned to wrap the buttons more > tightly > > (increasing the 3d illusion of the button) and not so higgeldy piggeldy? > > > > Just sayin :) > > > > /d > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
