Matthew you have right, Good models are gears of the progress. Comparison is the mother of the progress. Those discussions should not take consideration for not funded opinions. I think this is good because " ... " / this is not ok because " ... ".
Else ...words in the wind. Significant facts are being done by significant peoples. A significant people has funded positions. Always. "This theme is too MAC'ish/XP'ish/***'ish" -> so what ? where's the point. My other 20 cents Matthew Nuzum wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007 1:53 AM, [someone] wrote: > > Looks nice indeed. But doesn't it look too much like MacOS? > (except for the color palett of course) > > > I propose a new rule that anyone who says, "that theme looks too much > like [some other OS]..." must also back up their statement with an > objective comparison of the elements in question. I think it's being > tossed out as a generic criticism. I'm all for constructive criticism > and I'm certainly not opposed to people voicing their dislike for all > or part of a mockup, but its most helpful if the concerns are specific. > > Just my two cents. > -- > Matthew Nuzum > newz2000 on freenode -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
