> > Union, as it stands, (below) i find a bit too soft and 'faded', as > though it's been left in the sun too long. for this reason it may be > especially difficult to use in strong-light conditions. it also looks > far too dependent on compiz. > > nonetheless - and like it's predecessor above - there are one or two > ideas in there that are interesting (like the window outlines): > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union#head-5451daa7f88b46eaca94a24cfb5f869238c575ab > I think Union's colors are beautiful ! But I agree with François, maybe it is a little bit too monochromatic and UI elements should get stronger colors (titlebars, ...).
> Union is influenced by a mockup many people were enthusiastic about. it > was of course far too unrealistic to be actually implemented: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2620273#post2620273 > > i thought the colour palette worked well, complementing both warm and > cold colours without competition. > I think these colors are not as beautiful, but they could work very well on a real desktop ! > one you didn't post, that i thought showed some promise, is: > > > http://mossblaser.deviantart.com/art/Ubuntu-8-04-GUI-Design-Idea-72574609 > > it's good to see a working brown beyond the 'caramel' many Ubuntu users > are > tired of.. > Yes, the panels and tooltips brown is good (but I don't like the faded orange-beige inside the windows...). -- Yann Dìnendal
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
