ok, now just imagine that I can't observe that. Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded.
CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;) >> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal >> to be that way. >> >> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are >> interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and >> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. >> >> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on >> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? >> >> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way >> >> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat >>> more >>> powerful than GDM . >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to >>>> emerald? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu FTW! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nemes Ioan Sorin >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory like > someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) > It uses more memory per window than metacity > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
