On 21/01/10 10:40, Anton Kerezov wrote: > В 09:51 +0100 на 21.01.2010 (чт), Thorsten Wilms написа: >> Maybe people are not quite sure what this is about? >> Maybe the pixmap engine doesn't have many fans? > > I don't understand why people think pixmaps are bad. With the power of > today's computers you even don't see the difference between code based > and image based theme plus the fact that the detail and quality is at > least two times more for the little more you "pay". > >> >> You could try to raise some interest outside Ubuntu. > > I'll definitely ask some more about this. > >> >> If it's worth it? >> Is it possible the result would help you personally enough to make good >> for the effort invested? Could it lead to an influx of decent themes? >> Perhaps. I would likely try it out if it existed, but I would not write >> such a tool. I'm much too disappointed of GTK theming and every >> additional detail I learned about GTK made me like it less. > > But as you say I might wait and see what Gnome 3.0 will deliver on the > theming side. I thought that later this could be integrated with the css > theme engine by simply having two (or more in the future) buttons: > "Export pixbuf based theme" and "Export CSS based theme". > > > ____________________________ > Anton Kerezov > http://ankere.wordpress.com/ > >
Is there any idea when this might be completed/started? Looks like a genuinely useful tool -- Andrew -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
