Hey all, On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:55 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > The Deviantart group is best left to those who are there already. We > should not encourage use of yet another proprietary site. Especially > one > that lacks email notifications, making it a no-go for anyone on a > tight > schedule.
As the manager of the devientArt group, I would say that it's not a good system for organising collaborative work with free culture licenses. Everything about it would mean organising ourselves. Plus their indexing is fairly unreliable. It good for a users community, but is immature technically for the kinds of tools we need I think. On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 04:39 -0700, j_baer wrote: > More explanation about the art.ubuntu-owl.org site may be in order. > One of > the process breaks IMO we need to fix is just having things show up. > That > has not worked well in the past. Ubuntu-owl is our ubuntu-learning-materials website, a small website for the learning group to focus on and hang our coat. We had some experimentation with ccHost and put some effort into making art.ubuntu-owl.org, we wanted to see if it could be used to gather together useful svgs for making learning materials, marketing and other creative properties. Martin, -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
