Sergei, sorry I must have been writing my reply as yours came in!

On 18/11/10 15:04, ?????? wrote:

    I do not know the intent or the desired outcome of the authors of
    "screenshots.debian.net <http://screenshots.debian.net>", but
    drawing a conclusion from the URL I assume the
    desire was to offer Debian users a method to showcase their desktop.

No. In fact, it's a repository of /application/ screenshots. It's intended to give you some general impression about an app before you install it, nothing more. I already complained about the name in a parallel thread.

I agree. This is all about the packages, the apps that people can use and they can use them on distros other than Ubuntu.

    * The most pressing issue is screenshots may not be current and
    reflect what
    is being offered. In addition, there is no easy method (?) to
    expire an
    image and/or contact the submitter.

Outdated screenshots of an app will be quicky updated by fans of this application. Expiring an image is a matter of one click (and admin review, which is very swift at the moment). Moreover, screenshot requests from client apps can be made (or already are) version-specific, e.g. Lucid users will see the screenshot for the version they have and not the version from Maverick repo.
I think as part of a campaign we would be encouraging exactly that - the fans of an application to upload more screenshots!

    * The Software Centre is package centric and in reality a package
    may be an
    aggregate of several functional deliverables. Theme packages are a
    good
    example of this.

Synaptic is package-centric. Software Center is more application-centric and I hope it will improve over time. And I've never seen anyone posting screencasts of their themes - only screenshots.

    * In today’s world a graphic image is just one way to deliver
    information.
    The current solution does not support alternatives such as videos
    in the
    form of a screen cast.

The intention of screenshot is to quickly give an impression about the application. It's faster and less bandwidth-consuming (read: cheaper) to install the app than to watch a screencast of it.

Excellent point! Part of the Software Centre's role in life is to show how easy it is to get and use apps.

Ivanka

--
Ivanka Majic'
Creative Strategy Lead

Canonical Design Team
m: 07968704460
e: [email protected]


This email was sent using Thunderbird <http://www.mozillamessaging.com/thunderbird/> on Ubuntu <http://www.ubuntu.com/>.
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Reply via email to