On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:22 +0300, Сергей wrote: > 1. Every collaborative task must be proposed to wider audience and > accepted or declined by the community. > 2. It must be absolutely evident that a proposal is just a proposal > and > may be changed or declined. As a consequence, it must not be > located in > production namespaces (read: keep it in personal ) > 3. Decisions are made by reaching consensus of opinion, not by > voting. > 4. Admins have absolutely the same authority in making decisions as > non-admins do.
Sounds OK, although #3 is a nice way to keep us busy. #4 does not apply, as there is only one kind of wiki account for us. > Regarding the initial topic, I think it's insane to have one pool for > photos and illustrations alike. They cannot be judged in the same way > nor compared; > it's like comparing meters and kilograms. I don't think comparing illustrations to photos is more problematic than comparing landscape and macro photography ;) > One more thing. I doubt Canonical will endorse or not endorse this > initiative. If I were Ivanka, I'd wait and see what it turns out, and > then decide if any of these wallpapers make their way into default > installation. Exactly for this reason the submissions should be in the pool, where the jury will see them in any case. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
