On 1 August 2012 21:20, Ryan Prior <[email protected]> wrote: > Creative Commons isn't a license but a collection of licenses, some of > which are incompatible with Free culture and therefore of less value > to the Ubuntu Community.
I agree. > Public domain is also not a license. Whereas the Ubuntu community is > diverse and global, the public domain is not consistently recognized > internationally (some countries do not even have a public domain). This comes to me as a surprise. I thought public domain was universally recognized. > To be clear, CC0 is a combination of a dedication to the public domain > with a very permissive (and GPL-compatible) license for use in > countries where the public domain dedication might be found unlawful. Any GPL-Compatible viral license is a non-fully-permissive license. At least that's what I think. A fully permissive license would be a BSD style one. My 2 cents. -- Y -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
