Hello Simon,

Simon Ives wrote:
% Hi All.
%
% I'm currently writing a document for my university outlining the
% productivity benefits of using Linux for workstations.  Before you get
% too excited this isn't for the Uni's own workstations but as a guide for
% those students who wish to use Linux (the uni would like to
% 'unofficially' support Linux and would like to have a default list of
% applications that they can refer to).  I'll be using Ubuntu as the Linux
% example.

Great.

% I'm wondering if anyone on this list has any suggestions for me?  The
% document will be geared towards increasing productivity from a
% university student's perspective and be pretty basic.  Things like what
% features of Open Office are useful, how to us%e Tomboy Notes, how to use 
% Bibus etc. 

1) I think not making students submit assignment in one format (.doc for 
example) will be beneficial. Openoffice formats  (.sxw) are rejected simply 
because the markers do not think it's part of their job to install openoffice 
on their box. why? 

2) When students do coding using different JDK (for example IBM/Open-jdk) and 
do not wish to use Sun Microsystem's Java, he/she should be allowed to do so 
and do so without having to to worry whether it may run on marker's box/laptop. 
Why should student have to chose to do their homework using some particular JDK 
by some particular software company? If it was a task of essence such as real 
product, then I can understand but for assignments? come on, gimme a break. 
Students are there to learn and so should be able to experiment and play around 
with different compilers of their choice. Same goes for C++ ("MSVC++ on Windows 
platform"). Why not Gcc or even if proprietary path Icc(x86 is common amongst 
student's laptop & uni labs and they'll learn thing or two about 
optimisations)? Gcc-portable builds for windows are already available platform 
(MingW) and if the markers do not wish to use Linux, then it's their freakin 
problem. The university pays them to mark it for us. Not the other way around! 
The onus is on them, not us!

3) Free software that University should recognise should thus be -
a) Openoffice.org and PDF(open standard now I think?)
b) Gimp
c) Makefile (and not some windows msvc++ crap project files!)
d) Gcc
e) Open-jdk
f) Mozilla firefox ("The code should work on Internet Explorer! what a crap!)
g) Zim (personal wiki)

% the rest of the Ubuntu community to enjoy too.

Will be looking forward to it! 8-)

Just my 2 cents :)

Cheers,
Elmo :)

-- 
ubuntu-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au

Reply via email to