Karl Bowden wrote: > ... >> Not that it's all that important really. It's just a matter of >> aesthetics. And the frustration at trying to fix something that should >> be quite easy > > Just as a matter of - hey this is how I manager my old kernels.
Just to chime in with a "me too", my method is this: DON'T DO ANYTHING. A kernel package is never likely to fill your disk, and leaving it there costs absolutely nothing. More importantly, you have a fallback if you need to do something like move your hard disk into another system which for some reason doesn't work on newer kernels. I've been burned by other distros which overwrite the currently running kernel, and i'm glad Ubuntu lets those old ones build up. They come in handy from time to time! Paul
begin:vcard fn:Paul Gear n:Gear;Paul org:Liberty Systems & Software email;internet:[email protected] tel;work:07 3122 2198 tel;cell:04 3183 7656 url:http://libertysys.com.au/ version:2.1 end:vcard
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ubuntu-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
