Daniel Chen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:16 PM, David Henningsson > <launchpad....@epost.diwic.se> wrote: >> * As a first simple step, we could consider dumping "pactl list" and/or >> "pactl stat" and add as apport data. > Right, so those should be added to the hook in the pulseaudio package > (because they already are in apport-symptom's audio.py).
They are analyzed (for matching PA IDs against ALSA IDs and for checking default sink/source), but they are not added as apport data. The next question is whether we need it? I can't recall saying to myself "Now I really wish I had the pactl list output". But if Daniel or someone else feels the need for it, I could make the addition (in pulse's hook) and submit a merge proposal to Martin Pitt. // David _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev Post to : ubuntu-audio-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
