On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 06:54:52AM EST, Daniel Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: > > What I could cheekily do is bundle up a tarball that we can all call > > 0.9.22rc1 then you can use that for Maverick. Presumably you can then > > "update" it to the "official" 0.9.22 without any political problems of > > version bumps etc? That said, I'm not sure of the rules you have so even > > that may not be permitted. > > I'm in favor of something as Colin described with the caveat that > 0.9.22~rc1 or some variant will work "better" due to many packaging > tools' lexicographical sorting. I'll also note that Gentoo appears to > have been doing something similar for a while with unofficial > versioning: > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-sound/pulseaudio/ > > In terms of process, Ubuntu 10.10/Maverick still needs to merge a few > outstanding patches from stable-queue, but I don't anticipate that > being a blocker after the release of 10.10 Beta.
These are in my queue, but I had some weird behavior when testing previously. I need to clean up my build environment and test again. Luke _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev Post to : ubuntu-audio-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
