On 04/28/2011 11:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether we should add c-o-t-d builds for Natty just as we have
for Maverick and Lucid.
For the DKMS approach I'm working with, that should be up and running real soon
now even though I have been fighting more problems than expected. That's just
for the HDA modules though, but that should cover more than 95% of the times we
want to use it
anyway.
Should we maintain both versions for Natty and see which one we end up using,
or should we skip the daily c-o-t-d builds for Natty and wait for my DKMS stuff
to become available instead?
I can assist with whichever decision is made. It's pretty simple now
to keep the cotd running.
David, do you want to take over cotd completely?
Brad
--
Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev
Post to : ubuntu-audio-dev@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
