I have sent two backport requests over to James Troup, hoping that the process would auto-open the breezy-backports tree...

On 11/3/05, Sebastian Dröge < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Do, 2005-11-03 at 13:22 -0500, matt nicholson wrote:

> the main reason i ask is actually because of rhythmbox (and banshee
> maybe ). alot of good thing have been happening in rhythmbox as of late
> and i think people(ie, those whom do not build from cvs/source
> constantly) would like to have the newest version and all its great new
> features. plus as far as i know its already in the dapper tree.

I'll take care of a banshee backport after I've actually updated it in
dapper and made it breezy-compatible ;) Don't worry, it will come sooner
or later :)

Bye


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDalaoBsBdh1vkHyERAvX9AJ9JJMT0XgD+HzFuZZd85j/1D/3cugCfeuDg
5qUWFTK1HMJQISO/scWAips=
=x32i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports



-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Reply via email to