Yes, that would be necessary in that case... but I don't care enough to
write such spec... maybe jdong wants to ;)
Hmm, exactly what do one of these spec things look like? ;-)
I might write one, because there are always those little things (like a simple package name change) that stops an otherwise perfectly good backport candidate in its tracks.
-- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
