On 11/23/05, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, I see... Do you see its usefulness as a backport, or should we cancel > it? >
It's certainly useful as a backport, but I think my breezy package would be better. Of course this is one of those source changes you're trying to make a spec for... :) -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com -- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
