On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:10 +0000, Brett Presnell wrote: > I'm not sure I understand. I believe that the specific bug that I > mentioned has been fixed in 0.30.
Sorry for the confusion; I was justifying to the higher powers why a bugfix update is being handled through edgy-backports rather than the preferred edgy-updates channel. This package looks good for backporting to me, I'm gonna let it still sit for a while more to make sure no further defects are found in the backport, at which time I'll approve it. Thanks for your participation in the Backports project. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
