Hi backporters, This comes out of a discussion in #-devel where it was noted that there are loads of unofficial debhelper backports going around.
Can we figure out a way to do backports of debhelper sanely? The standard policy obviously will not work, but it should be possible to have some kind of exception given the stability that debhelper historically (and somewhat necessarily) has. We did it for hardy, apparently. Not sure what happened there. I expect >= lucid to be the interesting targets. Apparently it backports pretty cleanly, although I haven't tried myself yet. Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
