To follow up on this; during the team mtg today, we agreed to leave the draft charter as is, awaiting specific feedback from the TB. Please read the mtg minutes for more details. https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/04/06/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:57 PM Dan Streetman <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, it looks like the TB 'ratification' of our charter is basically > stalled and I don't see any kind of vote on it actually happening > anytime soon. > > What I'd like to propose to our team is to simply drop our need to get > any kind of ratification from the TB, and to remove the TB approval > stipulation from our charter (so our team can make changes to it just > by a vote). > > There's no actual need for us to get our charter ratified by the TB > that I know of (I certainly don't know of anything in writing > requiring it), and we always considered the TB to have the power to > overrule and/or revert any decision or action we made, anyway. So > simply approving our own charter and moving on without the TB probably > is the best approach, IMHO. > > If you both have no concerns about that, I'd suggest that we do one > more round of discussion on the charter with the 'TB approval' parts > removed and make any other adjustments we think are appropriate, and > then vote to finalize it, and move on with actually getting real work > done :-) > > One change we may want to consider is adding a higher vote requirement > for charter changes, like maybe a 2/3 or 3/4 vote instead of simple > majority - like what mapreri suggested before. That probably makes > more sense without the additional requirement for TB approval. > > We do have a IRC meeting tomorrow (Wed) so we can discuss then if > needed and hopefully have a decision by the end of the meeting; I'll > put a discussion item on the agenda. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
