Hello Nathan,
we had a couple of meetings in the Backports and we have some concerns
about this proposed update:
1) you haven't provided any debdiffs, nor it's clear who is going to prepare
the backports and do the future maintenance, as you don't seem to be an active
Ubuntu contributor
2) you'd like to do the bpo from kinetic, but doing so will break updates as
jammy is not covered. You'll need to either include a jammy bpo, or ignore
kinetic and do the bpo from jammy, unless there are relevant changes later on.
3) I'm going to subscribe the ubuntu server team and I noticed that Andreas
Hasenack subscribed himself already, as before approving such package I'd
totally like to have their input
4) the bug #1812280 you mentioned is in a different source package, but either
way, if it's relevant then it should be handled via SRU and not necessarily be
considered while evaluating the benefits of backporting nfs-utils
5) I think I'd like to have the tests a little better defined than "tested the
package manually in focal without any issues so far"
Thank you for your interest!
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676
Title:
[BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
