2007/5/17, Kevin Van Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I see no problems in using the ubuntu.com ro ubuntu-nl.org style. Less
work for me, but i'd like to see how maintainable that ubuntu-nl.org site
actually is. (admin-wise i mean)


It just so happens that I have access to a few parts of the ubuntu-nl
website. I am able to edit pages and add pages through a simple Django Admin
interface, but I don't know if there are more features that are only
reserved for the head admin (Dennis Kaarsemaker).

But the website is a good starting point. And the big advantage when using
this is that you'll be able to help not only ubuntu-be but also ubuntu-nl.

2007/5/17, Jan Claeys < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

AFAIK (I didn't look at the code), ubuntu-nl is in several places a bit
of a hack around existing bits of the previous site and the ubuntu-nl
forum?  (I really should have a look at that code though...  :) )


Well yea, the profile system uses data from the punbb database if I'm not
mistaken and punbb itself is patched too because of this, so you could say
that there are a few hacks involved, but what's the harm in that if
everything works well?

Please note that also I haven't looked at the code yet, so I don't know how
everything works under the hood, but I have yet to encounter problems with
the ubuntu-nl website.

--
Wesley Stessens < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Human Knowledge Belongs To The World - Antitrust (2001)
http://wesley.debianbox.be
-- 
ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected]

You can find list info and your subscription configuration options at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be

Reply via email to