Op woensdag 23-12-2009 om 14:34 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Y P: > IMHO it's an easy way politics does like to repush the responsibility > of those faults to another, here in this case they doesn't choosed the > software offered, but they does accept to contribute in it! so this is > a support of those non-free solutions, wheneven they do write you that > it's the responsibility of the firms that were proposing the > solutions.
Actually, as Mila Druwe says, the government is not allowed to push/force a particular proposal (that would be against fair compatition). They can set some objective criteria though. E.g. once the government finally moves over to ODF as the only real open document format (as there exist no implementations of OOXML, and probably never will), then the government can require compatibility with ODF (so that people can communicate with the government efficiently). -- Jan Claeys -- ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be
