Big cheers for the hard work. It's a good start to a proper organisation. Cheers, Jan.
On 10 March 2011 13:45, wouter Vandenneucker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys > > > I've made a report of what we did yesterday. I kinda forgot to post a > reminder so I guess it's my fault that there was so little people to help > out. > Anyways, we've done quite a lot yesterday and I'd like to thank jean and > jurgen for their efforts! I'll add this report on the wiki as well. > > We continued the work done the last time. We started from the top op the > homepage and digging deeper and deeper in the wiki. This enables us to do > see which pages are "lost" or without a link. They will not show up on the > homepage nor on the Legacy page. > > > = What we've done = > • Updated the homepage > • Finished BelgianTeam/FacebookTeam > • Removed the Pictures page as it only had 1 photo of Feisty Fawn. We did > note that the pictures can be found on the page of the even itself. We also > strongly recomment the use of the flickrpool. Make sure to upload all > pictures regarding ubuntu-be with the ubuntube tag. > • A little guidance text was written for the BelgianTeam/Approval > • We made clear that the ML is not a help or press desk, but a page > dedicated to support can be found on the website (link added aswel) > • For people comming on the BelgianTeam/PastMeetings true a searchcomputer > it was unclear where to find the new meetings. We added a link to > BelgianTeam/IrcMeetings > • We added a bunch of links to the german LoCo team (and ubuntuusers.de as > they seem to be connected so much) > • We made the support-point-manual on the website available on the wiki > homepage. This link comes instead of the initial support-point-manual on the > wiki. That page is added to the legacy section now > > = Remarks = > • There needs to be more active communitaction and decision making, things > go darn slow sometimes and this also results in the effectiveness of both > the wiki as the website > • We need to update the BelgianTeam/Responsibility but we have tell first > how we are going to be organized in the future > • BelgianTeam/Skills is something that should be added to your profile on > Ubuntu-be and not on the wiki. This ain't the place people are going to look > for it. If it are the other members who can search for certain skills here > the page should be maintained and updated. (IE take out who's not longer > active etc.) > • BelgianTeam/TeamOrganization is a sandbox for what U-be should become. > Once we agreed on this the content of it should be converted to fit the > BelgianTeam/Responsibility page. > • Please do not use placeholders, if a page needs to be created in the > future please do it then! Empty pages clutter our wiki! > • We need a team that bundles and works out a path to use ALL our social > networks in a decent way. a simultane notice on identi.ca, twitter, Orkut > and Facebook will strenghten us as we can target more people in 1 move. > There should be a way to add all 4 of them on a structurized way to the > webpage > • We've got a guide for the addition of links on the website. does it > belong under the contact section? How can we attract more companies to join > that page? (in addition how can we work more closely with companies without > giving up our freedom?) > • The BelgianTeam/PressCoverage should be updated, latest entry is of > 2009/10/30. We either need some one (or a group of people) who update this > page, or we need to close it and make it a legacy page. Remaining this page > as an open/running page with no new entries makes it look like we haven't > got a single thing done the last year and a half. > • The belgianTeam/PressReleases is a great page but with only 1 > pressrelease in it there seems to be a problem, again: pointing someone > responsible for this would resolve this.. PressContacts? > • Also, can someone please tell me why the title tags "= some title =" > don't work on this page? > • As for the Education page it also depents on someone who maintains it. > Without any current activities scheduled it is unclear what the use of this > page is. Clarification needed. > • Once again, same thing for the BelgianTeam/LocalizedCD. I believe we > suggested in january to wait until after Fosdem to continue talking about > this. > • Big kudos to Jean as all the pages that he looks after are a good example > of how to keep a wiki up to date. I do agree that it costs jean tons and > tons of work to keep it structurized and updated. Nevertheless I think that > if we give a bunch of people some kind of authority over 1 or 2 sections it > would dramatically improve the wiki. > • Events other then the dipro fairs need a fix plot. Just as DigitalWeek, > Software Freedom Day and Fosdem it is suggested to add events who happen > anually on this plot: BelgianTeam/NameOfEvent/Year > • We've got a double in the promotion material! To get more structure > jurgen and I moved the promotion section from BelgianTeam/ComputerFairs to > BelgianTeam/ComputerFairs/Promotion. A little later we discovered a > BelgianTeam/PromotionMaterial. It is suggest to merge these together, but we > where uncertain which page we should keep in place, ideas? > • The BelgianTeam/OSLessLaptopShops is a page that should be maintained, > jurgen and I are checking those who haven't been checked since 2006 to see > if they are still available. It is to our believe though that we should try > to have a tool like the supportermap where we can map these companies on our > website. If we could merge this with the commercial_links on the website it > would be nice. (This can wait until the supporter map is finished at we can > try to make this map a spinoff of the supporter map) > • We made the support-point-manual on the website available on the wiki > homepage. This link comes instead of the initial support-point-manual on the > wiki. That page is added to the legacy section now > • We should try to define the use of the website and the wiki beter. A > decent integration would benefit us. As jurgen said it: "The wiki sould be > more about a 'knowledge base' and not a 'who are we'? that should be the > ubuntu-be.org site. Although I understand that it is hard to find a way > that our website can be edited by everyone without putting the whole > infrastructure at risk. But a debat about this can be handy. > • What do e do with the FutureEvents page? Do we ditch it or what? Jean > allready added the note that people need to put links on the website, not on > this page. > > = Still to do (before the possible restructure of U-be) = > • add the links do the legacy pages > • map the "lost" pages > • add a link of the lates PCmagazine article about Ubuntu to > BelgianTeam/PressCoverage > • Translate the commercial links on the website to FR and GE (bug has to be > made) > • Place a link to the ubuntu-de wiki. right links can be found at > http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ubuntu-de-locoteam > > = Off topic = > New shirts are ordered! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > I suggest to talk about these things on some of the upcomming IRC meetings. > Maybe we can add 1 topic each meeting or postpone some not-time-critical > topics for a week? (Although I believe it's most important to talk about the > structure change first) > > > kind regards > > > > > > > Wouter Vandenneucker > > -- > ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected] > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be > > -- Microsoft programs are like Englishmen. They only speak Microsoft.
-- ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:[email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be
