> > > After the application is received two or three positive endorsements of > > > the applicant will be required for their approval in the team. > > > > Yes a vote of majority is enough there (being 2 votes now). > > A majority of what? The Bug Control team has about 100 members at the > moment.
I think Pedro was referring to the current three administrators for the bug-control, and he did not realise you were proposing "power to the people". I would like to propose a slightly different approach: * any three can approve, but bug-control administrators have veto power. . * bug-control decisions are final (but subject to explanation if requested). > > > > Additionally, the review process should be limited to a one week > > > (calendar) period after the application has posted to the mailing list. What happens after one week of no response? Approval by fiat? Or should bug-control administration act? This is actually a good point. I suggest we propose that candidates should be present in the #ubuntu-bugs -- this will hopefully allow for interaction between candidates and others. This should help on receiving reviews. Thank you Brian and Pedro. ..hggdh..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editemails More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
