On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Marcus Asshauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > i 'm doing bug triage since March and i want to assign to Bug-Control. > > > Application: > 1) Yes i promise to be polite and i have signed the CoC a few weeks ago. > 2) Yes i read it and have at this moment no questions about it. When i > have questions about bug triage i (would) ask in #ubuntu-bugs if this is ok. > 3) I would look for username and passwords, bank or credit card data, > PINs or private address information. > 4) In the past i did a lot of firefox bugs and for the future i would > work on KDE related bugs, because i 'm a kubuntu user. > 5) Some of my bugs: > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/kdesdk/+bug/253659
It looks like he sent it upstream, and reported another as a duplicate; good. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-kde4/+bug/253279 > This one I am not sure I agree with. He marked it Invalid because it was a driver issue and not a kde issue. I feel that should have been Invalidated against kde, but opened against the driver; it is still a bug. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/252660 Translations are always good, though this should go in the description with the original message placed below it. > Because i come from germany i translate this german description to > english. I think this gives more users a chance to deal with it. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/251633 > This bug is not an ubuntu bug so i marked this as invalid but i > forwarded it to the gnucash bugtracker. > I agree with his actions here, it was very courteous to file an upstream report. By the way I have never seen a report from a non-Ubuntu user before :) > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/kdesdk/+bug/253912 > Before marking this bug as a duplicate i talk with apachelogger about > this. If this bug wasn' t a duplicate i would give it "Medium" Importance. > Looks good, good use of a stock response. However the master already has an Importance of Medium. Overall I think Marcus is a solid and courteous triager, and a good asset to Ubuntu. A bug translator and a KDE triager are both things I think we lack in proper amounts. However for these tasks, BugControl isn't necessary. More desired Importances would have nice as that is a large part of BugControl. I personally like to see another 3-4 bugs of Undecided importance, with suggested importances, or maybe some bugs to move to triaged. But overall I think Marcus is moving in a great direction. Mike Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
