-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Westby wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 16:13 +0200, Andreas Moog wrote:
>>> 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are >>> interested in helping out with? >> I mostly go the list of bugs down and don't have a preferred package. >> But I would be very interested in helping with xorg and mozilla-packages. > > I assume you know about their different requirements for bugs, > especially the different process used in mozillateam. What do you > think of them. Do you think having different processes for different > packages is a good thing, a necessary evil, or something that should be > avoided? What i especially like about the mozillateam bug-howto is the idea of a standardized buglayout. This should in my opinion be adapted to other packages with a high-volume of bugs filed because it makes it easier for developers to find the information needed. And the general process of triaging is the same for all packages. (Request information, reformat bug-description, forward upstream if needed) The main difference lies to what information is needed. And this is a must-have. If you have a kernel-related bug it does not matter what javapackage you have installed. (Just as an example) Regards, Andreas Moog -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAki25s8ACgkQ06FgkPZwicScUQCg0znm6FOJT44KQyASHzwzTx4t AlcAn2Dsbbj9h5t8NznuokrI0AnGiPjX =4hEm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
