On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:50:54PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:07 -0400, Jonathan Jesse wrote: > > > I think I sent this directly to Lydia, however a big +1 on this. Also > > Riddell on #kubuntu-devel was asking on the status of this as well. > > Brian, > > I believe this is the first developer-advocated application we have > had under the new application scheme, how should we proceed. > > I don't see anything wrong with (the first) Jonathan's application, > having looked at a sample of his bugs, so I would normally vote in > favour of it, but I don't know what the procedure is where the > applicant doesn't directly submit any bugs.
Ah, I must have missed the fact that he was having a developer vouch for his application. This is actually the first time this has happened, a developer vouching for a triager, since we've moved to the new group review application process. In the past I'd get pinged on IRC by the developer and then approve the application. I'll approve this person's application but additionally would like to know if any objects to this process. Thanks, -- Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
