> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:53:17 -0700 > Brian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for your interest in joining the Ubuntu Bug Control team. As > > part of the application process we need to ensure that the following > > criteria are met. > > > > 1) Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to > > you or Ubuntu? > > Yes > > > Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > Yes, launchpad name used is charlie-tca > > > 2) Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage[0], Bugs/Assignment[1] and > > Bugs/Importance[2] at wiki.ubuntu.com? Do you have any questions about > > that documentation? > > Yes, I read the pages. > No, I have no questions at this time, although I seem to ask on > #ubuntu-bugs as they come up. > > > 3) What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage[1] for more > > information. > > Check for CoreDump.gz; if still attached look at the stack trace > to see if it contains enough information. If there is enough > information, remove the CoreDump.gz attachment. > Check the Stacktrace.txt for anything that looks like > sensivitive information passed as function arguments, including bank > account numbers, passwords, etc. > > > 4) Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > > interested in helping out with? > > Xubuntu team packages > > > 5) I also need to see a list of five or more bugs which you have > > triaged. These bugs should demonstrate your understanding of the triage > > process and how to properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list > > that does not have an importance indicate what importance you would give > > it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use urls in > > your list of bugs so I can more easily find them. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-places-plugin/+bug/271689 > Confirmed apport bug > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/254655 > Confirmed and forwarded upstream
This one ended up not being a bug. The final status should not have been "Fix Released" -- since there was no fix --, but "Invalid". I corrected it. Otherwise, good work! > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar-volman/+bug/220987 > Confirmed and found upstream; linked to upstream bug Good work. I set Importance to LOW. Also, it might be a good idea to document the workaround (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Description). I have added it in. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/231923 > confirmed; importance should be medium a test case and the packages versions should have been added. Otherwise good work. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/220780 > sent to translation team; importance should have been low Good work. All that is left if verify if it is already released, and mark it so. I cannot do that, since my Hebrew is almost null. (snip) The other bugs are similar. I have seen, and interacted with Charlie on #ubuntu-bugs, and consider him a good fit. +1. I wish more of us would be using the improved description (as linked above). It *does* help, since the most critical data will be at the beginning of the bug report. ..hggdh..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
