On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 02:40 -0700, Quinlan Pfiffer wrote: > Hello, my name is Quinlan, and I'd like to apply to join Ubuntu Bug > Control. Heres my application: > > 1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to > you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > I promise to be as helpful and polite as possible to the people in need > of my assistance. > > 2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? > > I have read each of these documents carefully, and refer back to them if > I feel uncertain about a task/bug/item/whatever. > > 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more > information. > > I should look for any personal information passed via Apport before > making the bug public (passwords, name, bank info, boat's name, etc.) > > 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > > At this time I am content with simply going through bugs and making life > easier for the developers. If I can get some of the flack out of the > way, I'm happy to be involved. > > 5 bugs that I have triaged: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tangerine/+bug/381494 > (I would give this bug low importance)
There is no reason or explanation as to why this should be a bug - this should be explained in more detail. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nouveau-kernel-source/+bug/381474 > (I would keep this bug as undecided, until more info is given) Good with debugging, but should be set to Incomplete as we are waiting for a response from the reporter. Importance fine. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/301917 > (Since this bug is resolved, I would just keep it as undecided.) Don't believe this is a bug, maybe it should have been changed to a Question? Importance fine. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontforge/+bug/301453 > (This bug would be of medium importance, seeing as it crashes the a > non-core application) Although reproduced, no explanation of which versions it was tested in, was this fixed in a later release? Low importance not medium - not a core application and can be worked around easily. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/257773 > (Obviously I would mark this one as wishlist) This Wishlist was already reported upstream in GNOME bugzilla as stated in the GNOME tracker report, this should be linked to the original - is this a duplicate on LP? Importance fine - wishlist. > ...and that should be it. Hopefully I make the cut. Thanks for the > review. > > Q.P. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp +0 - quite a few errors I think, but with more practice and a re-read of the Bugs/Status, Bugs/Importance, and the Debugging Procedures I believe this person *could* be accepted into Bug Control, but unfortunately I do not believe the user is apt at triaging just yet. Keep trying though! :-) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
