On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 15:52 -0700, Leo Jackson wrote: > BugControl, > > 1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to you > or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > I promise not to be rude, treat them like I want to be treated. Yes I signed > the Code of Conduct https://edge.launchpad.net/~lajjr/+codesofconduct > > 2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > I have read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance ? Question about these not at the moment. > > 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash report > bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more information. > Usually it depends what program crashed and what you were doing. After seeing > these for some time I have found CC#s, SSN#, Bank info, Login info, passwords, > You can find many private items. I have seen medical records #'s, Medicare > Group #'s, believe me there are items you can still list more of. > > 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are interested > in helping out with? > Packages yes groups oh yes. > Gnome, Inkscape, Packaging, Maintaining many packages, crushing bugs and > creating patches. > Apport, Packaging, Checkbox, KDE, X mostly python related programs.
Worthy tasks, all of them! But... specifically here, we are really worried about the triaging of bugs ;-) > > 5. Please list of five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs should > demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly > handle bugs. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/401959 > Importance: Low Set to Triaged Explain: I set it to low do to usage I would > set to medium this package has not been added yet crazy good program usage is > low. > If all goes well it will be finished in the next day or so. Good work; but this is not a bug in Ubuntu... I am not sure about the importance -- 'low' is probably more applicable. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/mago/+bug/385570 > Importance: Wishlist Status: Inprogress I have tar.gz files attached with > images. Explain: I will be making some more other images not completed yet. Although worthy work, it does not really show any triaging skills. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/getdeb.net/+bug/393508 > Status: Fix Committed Importance: Wishlist Explain I took this to help out a > group I joined with this I had created a package beside to use as a > dependence. Again, I see no triage work here. Furthermore, this is *not* an Ubuntu official package. The Ubuntu bugSquad and bug-control deal with *Ubuntu bugs. Apart from that, seems to be good work. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-on-rails/+bug/415966 > Status: Confirmed Importance: Wishlist I set to confirmed I didn't see the > plug in, and wishlist cause I will package and I wish I had the plugin. Again, no real triage. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/370158 > Status: Incomplete Importance: Undecided Explain set to incomplete my (pitti) > I agree responce is needed and not given to wheater it is still a problem. Finally, I can see Triaging In Action ;-) Just one comment: it took me some time to parse "An error on the config remove reinstall use purge to remove configuration files try." Please do use punctuation (commas, etc). Also, I would set Importance to Low. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/370346 > Status: Incomplete Importance: Undecided Explain I agree with David we have > to wait for responce from Raryel. I would set Importance to low here. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/jaunty-backports/+bug/401960 > Status: Confirmed <-- should be set to triaged. Importance: Undecided <-- > Should be set to low Low due to useage. Explain useage is low it is a good > program there is a lot of people that use it at this time not in Repos so not > many in Ubuntu or they install it from tar.gz Again, not a bug, but a package/backport request. No comments. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/intrepid-backports/+bug/415678 > Status: Confirmed <-- should be set to triaged. Importance: Undecided <-- > Should be set to low also due to low usage. Again, not a bug, but a package/backport request. And you yourself opened it. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/baltix/+source/qgis/+bug/175992 > Status: Fix Committed Importance: Undecided <-- Should of been set to low Low > due to Usage Not a bug, but an ITP. I agree with the Importance. I also looked at your activity on Launchpad. I was able to find about 40 bugs/ITPs/backport requests. Your activity seems to be mostly directed to packaging/coding, and almost no bug triage experience. Membership in bug-control requires triaging experience. Unfortunately, you do not show it. I *do* note that you show a lot of work on packaging, and I thank you for that. Please wait some more weeks, and work on some bugs (*not* SRUs, or ITPs, or backports); then please apply again. I will be happy to approve your request *once* you show bug triaging experience. -1. Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
