On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 08:22:06AM +0530, Arky wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for reviewing my application. > --- On Mon, 7/9/09, Scott Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 5. Please list five or more bugs > > which you have triaged. These bugs should demonstrate your > > understanding of the triage process and how to properly > > handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not > > have an importance indicate what importance you would give > > it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use > > urls in your list of bugs. > > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/424804 > Importance: Medium
This looks great, thanks for taking the time to forward this upstream and adding a bug watch. I agree with the importance of Low that the bug report has because it is one that can be easily worked around. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/412476 > Importance: Low Thanks for adding a patch to the bug report! However, I don't see any actual triaging work done on this bug report. I do agree with an importance of Low though. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-orca/+bug/343712 > Importance: Low Thanks for taking the time to forward this upstream and adding the bug watch this is quite valuable. It seems that the bug report could use some cleanup now though. I think the gnome-orca bug task can be Invalid, a new task added for openoffice.org in Ubuntu and a bug watch for the openoffice bug report mentioned in the upstream bug added. However, the work you did of forwarding this upstream was very valuable as it ended up in the bug being resolved! I agree with a Low importance here. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/module-init-tools/+bug/411534 > Importance: Low This looks fine, however the wrong sponsors team is subscribed to the bug report as the package is in main not universe. It might also be worthwhile to forward this bug report and patch to Debian if they also have the bug. I agree with a Low importance. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/envyng-core/+bug/411915 > Importance: Low Thanks again for adding a patch to this bug report, however the triaging work isn't particularly interesting. Again I agree with an importance of Low. > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemulator/+bug/348718 > Importance: Low Your work on the Ubuntu bug seems fine and thanks for forwarding the patch upstream. However, it looks like you might have used submittodebian to send the patch upstream. I'm not certain this was entirely correct since the patch you were forwarding has not be included in an Ubuntu package, but thanks for sending it to them! Low again seems correct. Based on the quality of your work I'm happy to approve your membership in the Bug Control team. Congratulations and welcome! Sincerely, -- Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
